Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 01:06
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$350
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
SC Int 130
SC Float 141
SC Mixed 137
109% 136 Pts
QC Int 432
QC Float 471
QC Mixed 456
102% 453 Pts
MC Int 646
MC Float 757
MC Mixed 714
105% 706 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6323
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 26.9
8% 27.9 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 38.4
12% 29.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti-$1,000
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
206% Outstanding
Lighting 596
Reflection 586
Parallax 738
200% 640 fps
MRender 522
Gravity 605
Splatting 312
211% 480 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 206%
Great: 233%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$330
41GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 433 160 142 154 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 212
Mixed 394
SusWrite 239
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 58.5
189% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 291 263 265 261 253 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 473
Mixed 386
SusWrite 296
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 58.7
194% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$282
24GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 494
Write 471
Mixed 373
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 39.6
144% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 196
185% 288 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 101%
TOSHIBA-TR150 1TB
211GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 423 260 267 250 247 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 485
Write 448
Mixed 417
SusWrite 316
310% 416 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 58.5
10,206% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
3,309% 362 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 101%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
74% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74%
Great: 127%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 2,958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $292

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $1,678
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback