Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '18 at 19:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 975
92% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,283
79% 1,283 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.70
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 202
Reflection 211
Parallax 208
165% 207 fps
Gravity 195
Splatting 135
142% 165 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 481 490 487 459 474 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 502
Write 489
Mixed 364
SusWrite 477
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 0.3
91% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 180
167% 254 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 111%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
313GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 462 400 374 374 381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 479
Mixed 382
SusWrite 408
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 45.1
146% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 342
251% 329 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$248
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 28.5
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 34.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 48.1
83% 48.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 4,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback