Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2HP  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '18 at 12:39
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 190
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 305
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (73 fps cap detected)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 73.9
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 64.2
60% 70.3 fps
MRender 73.7
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 73.2
59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandis SD8SBAT128G1122 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z233
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 170 171 168 167 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67% Good
Read 447
Write 137
Mixed 165
SusWrite 164
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 12.7
111% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 79.1
84% 139 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AAKX-221CA 500GB
259GB free
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 106 107 107 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 91
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 108
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
831GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 153 159 158 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 171
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 158
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
301GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 101 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 87
Write 38.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 99.8
80% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2HP-CF Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2HP - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback