Wacom Cintiq Companion 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemWacom Cintiq Companion 2  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL CRESCENTBAY
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 06 '18 at 18:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5557U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 160
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 262
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Device(1B0A 019B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 8.67
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 11.5
7% 9.86 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 12.8
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GDNU 512GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUXA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 67 67 63 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 381
Write 138
Mixed 224
SusWrite 64.6
44% 202 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 40.7
110% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 92.7
DQ Mixed 184
146% 211 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A3L-1GS64F3-12E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Cintiq Companion 2 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Wacom Cintiq Companion 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback