Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '18 at 17:35
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.40GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 81.9
2-Core 162
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 661
58% 491 Pts
64-Core 1,311
81% 1,311 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1713 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.16
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 31
Reflection 111
Parallax 100
25% 80.7 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 98.1
Splatting 85.8
75% 92.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,482
Write 4,598
Mixed 4,401
1,005% 4,494 MB/s
4K Read 431
4K Write 326
4K Mixed 369
1,298% 375 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 685
515% 691 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
62GB free
Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1089 1123 1122 1117 1149 999 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,403
Write 1,002
Mixed 854
SusWrite 1,100
244% 1,090 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 56.5
191% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 563
418% 558 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 207%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905622-057.A00G CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.4% Good
MC Read 30
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 21
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback