Asrock Z270M Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asrock Z270M Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '18 at 12:39
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 95.6 1-Core 142 2-Core 282 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 778 81% 650 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.16 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.9% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 190 Parallax 44.3 113% 124 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 61.8 48% 59 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 502 Write 478 Mixed 277 93% 419 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 49.9 176% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 174 181% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 86GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 111 114 113 114 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 107 Write 118 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 114 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.2 212% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 75%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 105 103 104 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 103 122% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31 98,777 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 22 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 25.6 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270M Extreme4

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	73x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	50x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	15x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	13x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	7x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	8x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GBKingstonBench 44%, 13,141 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $518

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16