Asus PRIME H310M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 05 '18 at 06:31
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 276
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 915
89% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 6324) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 2.27
Parallax 2.66
3% 2.82 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 5.04
3% 3.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,339
Write 8,308
Mixed 8,599
1,952% 8,748 MB/s
4K Read 1,074
4K Write 701
4K Mixed 791
3,013% 856 MB/s
DQ Read 2,149
DQ Write 1,447
DQ Mixed 1,667
1,279% 1,754 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 197GB
148GB free, PID 0723
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 18 17 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 19.3
Write 17.2
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 17.3
24% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.5
254% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FDD2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 26.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-E Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback