Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '18 at 19:41
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 312
101% 186 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 608
82% 611 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 04C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.8% Average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 77.2
51% 68.1 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 52.7
47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1311 312 307 311 311 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,928
Write 1,442
Mixed 493
SusWrite 477
240% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 55.6
225% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,050
DQ Write 1,085
DQ Mixed 774
663% 970 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 222%
Great: 236%
Intel Optane+3.6TBHDD
2.5TB free
Firmware: 16.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 143 144 144 144 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 120%
Adata S102 Pro USB 3.0 8GB-$15
4GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.83% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 12.2
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 11.9
19% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.83%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback