Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 202 75% 130 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 388 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36F9) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.69% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 4.31 4% 4.32 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.69% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 261 Write 244 Mixed 183 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 96.7 4K Mixed 38.2 155% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 105 101% 159 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 899GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 184 184 184 186 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 212 Write 183 Mixed 110 SusWrite 184 126% 172 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF 8GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 18.5 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 17.3 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM