ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DT3
Memory	44.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100914
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	May 15 '16 at 22:37
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5649 736 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	65.7% Good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 62.7 2-Core 125 57% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 408 40% 328 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2871) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Lighting 23.3 Reflection 21.6 Parallax 24 19% 23 fps	MRender 33.8 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 25.6 22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
C400-MTFDDAT256M 256GB 55GB free Firmware: 04MH Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.7% Below average	Read 231 Write 227 Mixed 212 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 39.4 4K Mixed 5.13 46% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 89.9 DQ Mixed 4.61 19% 39.1 MB/s

Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98 9,315 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 06.5 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22% Poor	Read 91.6 Write 126 Mixed 123 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 6.47 34% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 16.4 DQ Mixed 6.99 7% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 84%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 136716136 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 450 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 168139168 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5824 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 260 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 36 36 64 (BE) vendor-specific 73 55 487981083 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 225 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 13411 (C2) HDA temperature 27 45 77309411355 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 7168300421785 (F1) Unknown 100 253 314782831444 (F2) Unknown 100 253 12256390921	88.3% Excellent	Read 157 Write 151 Mixed 152 116% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.21 67% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 365GB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 99 15128024 (03) Spinup time 91 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 524 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 8734737052 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7186 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 286 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 91 91 9 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 72 51 471203868 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 238 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 8803 (C2) HDA temperature 28 49 77309411356 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 1778116465761 (F1) Unknown 100 253 19442835278 (F2) Unknown 100 253 305560563271	52.3% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 86.6 Mixed 21.1 49% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.11 45% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 96%
Hitachi HUS154530VLS300 300GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 272GB free Firmware: B590 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 120 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.28 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.68 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 6x8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 6 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.2% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 19.2 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 10.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback