MSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B53
MotherboardMSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 07:43
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 706
75% 598 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Lighting 44
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 38.5
36% 41.7 fps
MRender 39.8
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 34.3
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 512GB-$226
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 390 171 365 417 416 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 414
Mixed 306
SusWrite 360
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 41.5
146% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 196
169% 248 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 173 173 173 173 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 151
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 172
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 135 131 135 134 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 100
Write 97
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 134
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 94%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1.5TB
354GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 83
Write 94.7
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 96
104% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 42%
I-O DATA USB Flash Disk 64GB
1GB free, PID 1017
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 151
Write 114
Mixed 18
104% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 2.07 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W4U2400PS-8GC17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 23.1
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.6
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53) Builds (Compare 985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VH (MS-7B53) - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback