Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 00:08
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 88
1-Core 122
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 710
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 959
59% 959 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 159
87% 118 fps
MRender 86.4
Gravity 110
Splatting 127
90% 108 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD T00 StoreMI 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 94 109 89 130 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 87%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
5GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.3 7 7.2 6.4 7.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 120
Write 7.5
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 7.2
32% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 34.6
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 31.8
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback