Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120926
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '18 at 22:35
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 34.9 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 71.8 29% 49.8 Pts	4-Core 97.4 8-Core 154 16% 126 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E241) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	29% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 32.9 Parallax 48.3 30% 39.3 fps	MRender 28.7 Gravity 30.8 Splatting 37.7 27% 32.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 181 134 79 54 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 308 Write 234 Mixed 199 SusWrite 104 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 22.2 77% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 84 DQ Write 88.8 DQ Mixed 80.7 62% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$39 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 117 124 124 127 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 126 Write 139 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 119 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 83%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 931GB free Firmware: 03.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 86 92 94 95 99 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 109 Write 102 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 89.1 66% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-1866C9-8GSR F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-1866C9-8GSR 24GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.2 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 228 18% 228 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	16x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	6x
A6-3500 APUAMD $60Bench 39%, 2,804 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	9x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	3x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	2x

SSD
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	2x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples	2x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16