Today's hottest deals

VIA EPIA-M920

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardVIA EPIA-M920  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150728
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 15 '16 at 17:46
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA QuadCore C4650@2.0GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 51
32% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 97.9
13% 99.4 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36D2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6519
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.6% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 43.7
33% 42.7 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 36.4
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
768GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EPIA-M920 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: VIA EPIA-M920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback