Asus P5K SE/EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5K SE/EPU (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080618
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '18 at 08:32
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 38.3 2-Core 76.5 40% 61.3 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 151 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.7% Very good	Lighting 81.3 Reflection 113 Parallax 98.9 66% 97.9 fps	MRender 94.6 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 97.9 79% 96.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 229 Write 60.5 Mixed 49 24% 113 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 7.9 58% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 7.7 DQ Mixed 9.1 9% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 27GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 50 51 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 50.8 Write 51.5 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 50.8 37% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 59%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 403GB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 25 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 24.7 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.9% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K SE/EPU Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K SE/EPU

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	16x
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	8x
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	5x
GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
Fury 240GBHyperX $193Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	3x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	41x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $151

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16