PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LE (all builds) |
Memory | 3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131127 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 29 '18 at 02:28 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
60%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.6.1
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 78 70 41 49 62 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
CNMemory Spaceloop XL 16GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 8.2 8.9 12 11 11 MB/s
|
6.66%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
41.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 18x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 12x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $138 |