PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180919 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 28 '18 at 01:19 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
92.6%
Outstanding
|
88% 158 Pts
|
79% 645 Pts
|
84% 1,365 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
16% 20.5 fps
|
20% 24.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1649 1664 1705 1665 1699 1201 MB/s
|
328%
Outstanding
|
394% 1,765 MB/s
|
269% 92.2 MB/s
|
779% 1,057 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
166GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 487 488 490 492 493 MB/s
|
132%
Outstanding
|
106% 472 MB/s
|
209% 74.7 MB/s
|
279% 373 MB/s
|
![]() Drobo 5D 2TB
2TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
35.5%
Below average
|
47% 35 MB/s
|
365% 5.03 MB/s
|
|
![]() JetFlash Transcend 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 17 16 18 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
29% 23.8 MB/s
|
91% 2.2 MB/s
|
|
![]() Drobo 5D 17.5TB
9TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
48% 35 MB/s
|
345% 4.87 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz
|
120%
Outstanding
|
125% 43.6 GB/s
|
100% 35.1 GB/s
|
64% 62.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 429x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 91x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 53x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 79x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 67x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 53x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $1,099 |