Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '18 at 01:19
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 793
79% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.70
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1649 1664 1705 1665 1699 1201 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,472
Write 1,628
Mixed 1,360
SusWrite 1,597
394% 1,765 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 83.2
269% 92.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,168
DQ Write 983
DQ Mixed 1,019
779% 1,057 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 328%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
166GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 487 488 490 492 493 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 490
Mixed 412
SusWrite 489
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 61.9
209% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 134%
Drobo 5D 2TB
2TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 37.5
Write 41.2
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 21.1
47% 35 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 2.3
365% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 89%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 17 16 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 14.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 17.7
29% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.1
91% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 58%
Drobo 5D 17.5TB
9TB free, PID 3444
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 36
Write 41.8
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 20.8
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 2
345% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 40.8
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 33.8
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 120%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,099
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback