Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$75 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 160 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 227 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 222 14% 222 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Lighting 34.9 Reflection 25.3 Parallax 31.3 28% 30.5 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 31.9 28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0831C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 211 74 40 5.9 12 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.4% Poor	Read 223 Write 203 Mixed 183 SusWrite 69.1 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.4 35% 8.83 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46 8,198 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 74GB free Firmware: P22OABEA SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 50.7 Write 11.4 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 11.6 17% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 04EF Team-Elite-1600 8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	744x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	182x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	159x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	98x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	55x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 3,270 samples	40x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278