Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '18 at 01:12
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 260
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 722
77% 613 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 85E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 149
Parallax 129
109% 137 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 131
Splatting 109
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
131GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 316 315 317 316 316 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 445
Mixed 385
SusWrite 332
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 65.6
222% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 604 326 324 325 325 322 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,276
Write 1038
Mixed 483
SusWrite 371
176% 792 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 52.3
204% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,049
DQ Write 947
DQ Mixed 652
584% 883 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 180%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
70GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 151 180 167 153 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 154
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 152
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 26.9
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 30.3
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 49.7
80% 49.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback