Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '18 at 22:02
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 96.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 678
68% 555 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 87.7
57% 73.5 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 56.1
Splatting 78.3
55% 65.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 960GB-$59
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 130 121 121 121 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 326
Write 212
Mixed 225
SusWrite 123
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 23
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 88.2
73% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 101%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
201GB free
Firmware: 520A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 109 115 117 117 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 332
Write 210
Mixed 222
SusWrite 115
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 25.9
89% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 199
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 23.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback