Packard imedia S3800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard imedia S3800  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard FIH57
Memory0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '18 at 16:02
Run Duration704 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 126
53% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Acer(1025 0344) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.91
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
286GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 30 22 18 25 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 12.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 29.8
9% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0637
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 25.5
Write 24.5
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 26.2
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15%
Great: 67%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
98GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 10 9 8.7 22 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.9% Terrible
Read 28.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 13.9
19% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.9%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B2873EH1-CH9 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3800 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback