Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory101 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '18 at 01:45
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 73.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
82% 152 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 888
84% 697 Pts
64-Core 2,520
156% 2,520 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 193
Parallax 174
145% 182 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 171
Splatting 120
111% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2365 2369 2387 2416 1282 1187 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,544
Write 2,422
Mixed 1,444
SusWrite 2,001
472% 2,103 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 74.9
256% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,058
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 943
696% 922 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 344%
Great: 425%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
589GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2441 2444 2436 2430 2437 2432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,598
Write 2,444
Mixed 1,522
SusWrite 2,437
506% 2,250 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 77.5
266% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,166
DQ Write 1,003
DQ Mixed 1,079
810% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 383%
Great: 425%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
1.5TB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 483 483 484 483 484 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 481
Mixed 398
SusWrite 483
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 49.3
167% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 130%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 116 117 119 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 84
Write 86.5
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 117
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR128GX4M8X3600C18 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 24
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.4
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $832
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback