Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics65.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 15:29
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 81
2-Core 193
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 614
59% 487 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
EVGA(3842 2999) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.1% Good
Lighting 84.1
Reflection 91.9
Parallax 81.7
68% 85.9 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 77.3
Splatting 66.8
58% 72 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 85 50 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 336
Write 262
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 79
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 9.7
40% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 18.3
14% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
280GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 200 195 197 197 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 140
Mixed 72
SusWrite 196
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 34.8
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $866
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback