Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110401
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '18 at 04:26
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 190 75% 127 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 320 42% 313 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 8365) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.19% Terrible	Lighting 9.53 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 8 8% 9.58 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 9.83 Splatting 10.7 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.19% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 290 289 292 290 279 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Read 451 Write 451 Mixed 353 SusWrite 289 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 41.8 135% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 372 277% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 124%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 642GB free Firmware: SC11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 136 134 137 138 138 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 144 Write 136 Mixed 66 SusWrite 130 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF M378B5673EH1-CH9 Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 18.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	161x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	122x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	51x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16