Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150930
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 23:12
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 180 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 590 57% 471 Pts	64-Core 785 49% 785 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 411.63 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.5% Very good	Lighting 97.1 Reflection 114 Parallax 104 79% 105 fps	MRender 94.6 Gravity 101 Splatting 89.7 77% 95.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 186 197 175 190 191 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 415 Write 243 Mixed 246 SusWrite 193 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 39 128% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 249 199% 283 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 889GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 106 115 115 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 92.8 Write 55 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 107 48% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 78% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 148GB free Firmware: 3.AAF SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 86 85 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 75.8 Write 79.3 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 85.3 52% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 16 14 37 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	8.02% Terrible	Read 8 Write 35.2 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 19.7 14% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 61% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 8.02% Great: 114%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 28 15 14 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.22% Terrible	Read 13 Write 15 Mixed 9 SusWrite 15.9 18% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 24% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 7.22% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB-$420 211 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.8% Good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 22 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.9 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 157%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	196x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	115x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16