Supermicro H8QG6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro H8QG6  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8QG6
Memory30 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 20:57
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6174
CPU 1, 4 CPU, 48 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 64.7
36% 53.6 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 256
22% 191 Pts
64-Core 1,556
96% 1,556 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 4.44
4% 4.59 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.22
4% 4.98 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 117 110 115 117 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.7% Poor
Read 173
Write 106
Mixed 125
SusWrite 124
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 11.4
38% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 36.5
DQ Mixed 23.9
19% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965439-047.A00LF 9965439-046.A00LF 9965439-046.A00LF 9965439-046.A00LF 9965439-047.A00LF 9965439-046.A00LF 9965439-046.A00LF 9965439-047.A00LF 9965439-046.A0... 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H8QG6 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro H8QG6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback