Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 106 49% 78 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 339 34% 275 Pts	64-Core 809 50% 809 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 61%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 238 238 238 240 238 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59% Above average	Read 248 Write 238 Mixed 234 SusWrite 238 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 24.8 82% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ- 4x4GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 16 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.5% Average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 15.6 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.3 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	5x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	4x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- 128GBSamsungBench 96%, 8 samples	3x
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 23 samples	3x
M393B2G70QH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 96%, 50 samples	3x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16