Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Quad-Core Processor (up to 1.4GHz) 925 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Memory 9.94 1-Core 14.1 2-Core 28.7 10% 17.6 Pts	4-Core 44.9 8-Core 52.6 6% 48.8 Pts	64-Core 33.4 2% 33.4 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8250 1,387 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C730) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.42 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.68 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB 2,513 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT46K0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 127 130 115 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 285 Write 134 Mixed 138 SusWrite 123 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 14.5 48% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 54.8 55% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 1x4GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	8.28% Terrible	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 0.6 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 404 10% 404 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Processor (up to 1.4GHz)Quad-CoreBench 22%, 925 samples	27x

GPU
HD 8250AMDBench 1%, 1,387 samples	27x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	21x
PM851 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 2,513 samples	3x
LMT-256M6M 256GBLiteonitBench 77%, 528 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	23x
EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 1x4GBMicronBench 11%, 90 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16