Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 00:05
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 187
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 364
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Asus(1043 8365) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.19% Terrible
Lighting 9.53
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 8.03
8% 9.6 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 9.83
Splatting 10.7
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.19%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 270 268 278 275 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 459
Mixed 369
SusWrite 277
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 43.8
140% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 372
280% 373 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 132 132 132 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 131
Write 126
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 128
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
162% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
642GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 136 134 137 137 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 142
Write 140
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 132
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF M378B5673EH1-CH9 Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback