Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '18 at 02:56
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 626
61% 500 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 140
Parallax 116
105% 128 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 126
Splatting 105
90% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 67 51 41 9.9 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 448
Write 330
Mixed 312
SusWrite 62.6
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 28.6
124% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 98
125% 219 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $597
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback