Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '18 at 22:28
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 224
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 738
68% 566 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Gigabyte(1458 371A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.2% Good
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 80.1
Parallax 77.3
64% 78.5 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 72.6
59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 427 427 427 426 427 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,716
Write 1,337
Mixed 1,339
SusWrite 461
271% 1,213 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 69.9
246% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 791
624% 860 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 213%
Great: 228%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 114 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 93.4
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 113
68% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
171% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 125GB
95GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 33 39 38 39 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 114
Write 60.2
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 38.2
84% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.5
183% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C15 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 31.9
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $652
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback