HP h9-1110eo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h9-1110eo  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120314
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateSep 18 '18 at 18:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 191
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 512
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
XFX(1682 3220) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 53.8
33% 40.9 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 35.7
Splatting 35.9
27% 33 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0809
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 402
Write 186
Mixed 218
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 17.7
87% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 41.9
54% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
19GB free
Firmware: HP13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 117 127 126 132 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 92.2
Mixed 85
SusWrite 126
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673GB0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5673GB0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1110eo Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP h9-1110eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback