Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UD3  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '18 at 14:02
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 199
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 493
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 72.5
Parallax 87.8
58% 77.3 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 58.9
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 90 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 251
Write 160
Mixed 151
SusWrite 91.6
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 17.8
59% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 23.3
19% 27.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
662GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 93 93 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 261
Write 188
Mixed 203
SusWrite 92.9
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 25.1
82% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 52.7
DQ Mixed 39.3
30% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
435GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 331 327 328 330 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 354
Write 332
Mixed 318
SusWrite 329
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 34
121% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 98.6
DQ Mixed 49.5
43% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 126%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
345GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 60 56 56 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 43.5
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 57.4
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 47%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
350GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 80 78 78 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 91.6
Write 53.3
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 78.7
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL10-10-10 D3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 11.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,058 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $573
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback