Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '18 at 13:35
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 594
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1353 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.1
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 37% Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 319 317 320 318 305 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,106
Write 1,197
Mixed 806
SusWrite 345
194% 864 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 62.8
238% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 915
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 677
557% 797 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 176%
Great: 236%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 237GB
136GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 97 97 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 440
Write 415
Mixed 354
SusWrite 132
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 34.3
142% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 193
181% 281 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D26BFSE.8FE BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 BLS4G4D26BFSE.8FE 16GB
2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 32.5
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback