Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '18 at 18:54
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 930-$199 19,497 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 75 2-Core 150 63% 104 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 361 39% 308 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Lighting 63.2 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 82.3 52% 67.2 fps	MRender 56 Gravity 50.5 Splatting 71.5 50% 59.4 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 76 69 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 202 Write 25.3 Mixed 76.2 SusWrite 60.1 20% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 9.9 50% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 26.8 DQ Mixed 11.9 12% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 443GB free Firmware: CR100-11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 71 73 73 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 72.6 Write 78.2 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 72.5 50% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	43.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 16.8 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	80x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	58x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
MX500 1TBCrucial $80Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	75x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	44x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16