Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '18 at 18:37
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 181
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 359
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 61.3
56% 66.7 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 70.6
57% 69.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LE1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 142 141 143 144 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 298
Write 195
Mixed 205
SusWrite 142
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 29.7
109% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 177
132% 177 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
457GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 92 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 77.8
Write 81.8
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 90.7
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 65%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
24GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 142 141 155 181 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 131
Write 97.5
Mixed 75
SusWrite 157
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 112%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 65 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 64.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 64.6
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3500820AS 500GB
457GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 107 107 106 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 106
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-008.A01LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback