Asrock X399M Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399M Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '18 at 17:07
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 903
79% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,755
109% 1,755 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.8.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 37.4
26% 34.1 fps
MRender 29.8
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 39.7
27% 31.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 77 94 2.5 93 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 380
Write 320
Mixed 275
SusWrite 71.3
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 21.9
121% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 134
130% 199 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
57GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 126 121 115 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 121
Write 125
Mixed 83
SusWrite 118
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
389GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 142 145 145 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 158
Write 151
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 145
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 109%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
783GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 90
60% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55%
Great: 57%
Wilk 64GB
16GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.3 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 2.3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 2.7
6% 5.25 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 58.8
MC Write 58.9
MC Mixed 58.6
168% 58.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 147%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399M Taichi Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399M Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback