HP h9-1245eo

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP h9-1245eo  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120702
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '18 at 14:39
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 186
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 516
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 109
Parallax 109
84% 107 fps
MRender 91
Gravity 94.5
Splatting 85.9
74% 90.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 433 451 441 453 446 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 457
Mixed 343
SusWrite 440
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 36.3
117% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 361
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
135GB free
Firmware: MS2OA5R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 24 68 103 106 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 122
Write 119
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 85.1
63% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 99%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
174GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 22.5
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 29
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1245eo Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP h9-1245eo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback