Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP300E4C-AD5BR
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 21:36
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 76
2-Core 142
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) 1GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1277 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 16.8
16% 17.1 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 18.6
Splatting 0.09
10% 14 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 16%
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.96 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 7.39
4% 4.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S180 60GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0921B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 73 143 143 129 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 245
Write 173
Mixed 146
SusWrite 130
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 41.6
4K Mixed 10.2
59% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 60
71% 121 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
55GB free
Firmware: JE3OA50A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 51 55 71 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 65.4
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 63.1
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 50%
WDC WD32 00AAJS-00V4A0 320GB
146GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 23.9
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 27.7
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback