Dell Inspiron 600m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemDell Inspiron 600m  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X8957
Memory0.4 GB free of 0.75 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20050629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '16 at 12:55
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M processor 1.40GHz
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1-Core 13.4
2-Core 13.2
7% 13.3 Pts
4-Core 13.2
8-Core 13.5
2% 13.4 Pts
64-Core 13.2
1% 13.2 Pts
Poor: 5% Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080AT 80GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000000A0 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 21.4
Mixed 12.9
13% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.03
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
5% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback