Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5650 13,757 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 92 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 134 61% 97.7 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 383 38% 313 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 5GB 968 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Gigabyte(1458 3797) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 75 Parallax 72.7 61% 74 fps	MRender 57.3 Gravity 69.8 Splatting 62.7 52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 57%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 480GB 480GB 1,056 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 234 219 227 217 225 MB/s Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.9% Good	Read 257 Write 246 Mixed 221 SusWrite 218 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 30.3 106% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 63.8 DQ Mixed 57.5 59% 98.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170EH1-CF8 MXIC 25L8005 37GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1066, 33 MHz 4096, 33792 MB Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 11.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.9 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	88x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16