Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '16 at 01:48
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 139
61% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 400
40% 326 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
EVGA(3842 2794) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6510
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 86.5
51% 70.5 fps
MRender 74.5
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 53.3
48% 60 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$70
685GB free
Firmware: N1007C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 492
Write 375
Mixed 436
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 30.7
99% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 16
47% 101 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 105%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,365
Write 1,144
Mixed 1,240
279% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 22.8
133% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 23.2
37% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 167%
Great: 220%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
1TB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
1TB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
1TB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
ADATA SP 550 120GB
75GB free, PID 1351
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
185% Outstanding
Read 226
Write 195
Mixed 208
266% 210 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 15.7
1,779% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32
DQ Write 44
DQ Mixed 15.8
2,152% 30.6 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.2% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 11
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback