User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardSupermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory30.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140312
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 20:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 140
58% 96 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 278
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 2615) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.75
2% 2.19 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 1.78
2% 2.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 72 73 72 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 233
Write 113
Mixed 109
SusWrite 70.3
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 14.8
66% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 56.9
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 41.2
36% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SUPERTALENT02 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.8% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 25.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback