Lenovo 3548B3F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 3548B3F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180319
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 18:08
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 195
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 461
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 3091) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 76 98 111 90 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 126
Write 124
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 89.4
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 70%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 128GB-$51
89GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 25 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 32
Write 24.7
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 25.5
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback