Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H97-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 12:01
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 392
54% 400 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X312
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 76 31 106 120 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 446
Mixed 312
SusWrite 112
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 50.8
193% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 248
203% 288 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 93%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
58GB free
Firmware: CXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 163 37 246 226 261 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 487
Write 211
Mixed 238
SusWrite 194
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 25.3
100% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 110
100% 158 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
Wl2000gs A6454G 2TB
431GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 33 16 48 49 97 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 56
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 48.6
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 30%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 107
Mixed 73.5
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 105%
WD Elements 1TB
187GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.3
Write 35.8
Mixed 28.3
43% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $435
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback