Gigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 HD3-OP
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 02:29
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 733
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Elitegroup(1019 1039) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.9% Very good
Lighting 95.9
Reflection 106
Parallax 93.9
78% 98.5 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 95.1
77% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD20EZRX-00D8PB0 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 202 215 153 109 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 336
Write 200
Mixed 199
SusWrite 173
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 25.7
138% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 178
166% 261 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 131 130 130 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 112
Write 123
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 129
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 HD3-OP-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $721
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback