HP 810-160ea

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP 810-160ea  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140325
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 17:44
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 206
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 579
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
HP(103C 6892) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 31.6
20% 27.6 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 24.5
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 415
Write 185
Mixed 217
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 15.1
112% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 29.7
46% 86.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: HP36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 161 161 164 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 101
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 161
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 34 31 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 24.4
Write 23.9
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 35.6
35% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13%
Great: 42%
WD My Passport 259F 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 15.3
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 14.5
23% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 49%
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
480GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 14.8
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 14.3
22% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-160ea Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP 810-160ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback