HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2269
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170317
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 11 '18 at 13:29
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 50.9
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 68.7
33% 52 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 123
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 2269) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 3.75
2% 3.56 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.87
2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST120HM000-1G514 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C675
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 185 198 183 184 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 396
Write 266
Mixed 236
SusWrite 187
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 25
88% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 225
170% 228 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HTS541075A7E630 750GB
571GB free
Firmware: SE2OA4A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 102 102 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 100
Write 106
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 102
61% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback