Toshiba Satellite S55t-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite S55t-C  (all builds)
MotherboardFF50 06F4
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151008
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateSep 10 '18 at 20:34
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 41.6
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 42.9
23% 34.5 Pts
4-Core 81.7
8-Core 107
12% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Toshiba(1179 F84A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8233
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 5.41
5% 5.08 fps
MRender 6.52
Gravity 5.73
Splatting 8
6% 6.75 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GDNU 512GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUTA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 262 296 196 169 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 394
Write 336
Mixed 343
SusWrite 220
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 23.3
68% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 172
130% 176 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite S55t-C Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S55t-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback