Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '18 at 13:23
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 67
2-Core 117
54% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 202
25% 193 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 28.7
20% 27.6 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 33.2
24% 28.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056R6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 82 69 68 65 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 372
Write 301
Mixed 281
SusWrite 79
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 39
140% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 99.4
DQ Mixed 123
105% 157 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 83%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
212GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 290 294 291 292 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 390
Mixed 317
SusWrite 298
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 50.9
167% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 251
187% 247 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
52GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 84 82 79 74 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 393
Write 380
Mixed 314
SusWrite 115
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 45.8
160% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 151
139% 214 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 143 145 146 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 134
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 144
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 169 172 166 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 104%
USB DISK 28X 0GB
0GB free, PID 1a00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 2.5
Mixed 4
SusWrite 3.1
6% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 18.9
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 12.3
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $385
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback